Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Cad. saúde pública ; 29(9): 1903-1909, Set. 2013. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-686775

ABSTRACT

O uso de anfetaminas por motoristas de caminhão com fins ocupacionais é amplamente reconhecido, entretanto, no mês de outubro de 2011, sua produção e uso foram proibidos através de uma resolução da Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). O objetivo deste estudo foi identificar o uso de anfetaminas entre motoristas de caminhão após a implementação da referida resolução. Uma amostra de conveniência de 427 motoristas de caminhão foi abordada em rodovias do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil, durante o ano de 2012. Os participantes foram solicitados a responder um instrumento de pesquisa estruturado, assim como fornecer uma amostra de urina para avaliar o uso recente de anfetaminas através de análise toxicológica. Entre os motoristas avaliados, 7% fizeram uso recente de alguma substância ilícita, dos quais 2,7% usaram anfetaminas. Aparte a periculosidade associada ao uso de anfetaminas, assim como a despeito da resolução que o regulamenta, esse uso continua entre os motoristas de caminhão. Assim, sugere-se que as autoridades competentes fiscalizem a posse, assim como o uso de anfetaminas no contexto do trânsito.


Amphetamine use by truck drivers for occupational purposes is widely known. The production and consumption of amphetamines was banned by the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) in October 2011. This study analyzes persistent amphetamine use by truck drivers since the ban was implemented. A convenience sample of 427 truck drivers was taken along highways in São Paulo State in 2012. Participants were asked to answer a structured questionnaire and provide a urine sample to screen for recent amphetamine consumption through toxicological analysis. Among the interviewed drivers, 7% had used some illicit drug recently and 2.7% had used amphetamines. Amphetamines are still consumed by truck drivers despite the risks and the recent ban. The authorities should thus monitor the possession and use of amphetamines by drivers in order to effectively enforce the ban.


El uso de anfetaminas con fines profesionales entre los conductores de camiones es ampliamente reconocido, sin embargo, en octubre de 2011, su producción y uso fueron prohibidos por una resolución de la Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (ANVISA). El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar el uso de anfetaminas entre conductores de camión después de la implementación de esa resolución. Una muestra de conveniencia compuesta por 427 conductores de camiones fue abordada en las carreteras del estado de São Paulo, Brasil, en el año 2012. A los participantes se les pidió rellenar una encuesta estructurada, así como dar una muestra de orina para determinar el consumo reciente de anfetaminas, a través de análisis toxicológico. Entre los conductores evaluados, el 7% consumió recientemente algún estupefaciente, de los cuales un 2,7% había consumido anfetaminas. Aparte de los peligros asociados al uso de anfetaminas, y de la resolución que lo regula, ese uso sigue vigente entre los conductores de camión. Por lo tanto, se sugiere que las autoridades competentes supervisen la posesión, así como el consumo de anfetaminas, en el tráfico rodado.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Amphetamine/urine , Automobile Driving/statistics & numerical data , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Amphetamine-Related Disorders/urine , Amphetamine/administration & dosage , Automobile Driving/legislation & jurisprudence , Brazil , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Illicit Drugs/urine
3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-40437

ABSTRACT

Sixty-two urine samples from truck drivers and drug addicts were analysed by TDx (Abbott Laboratories) for amphetamines. Eighteen samples were found to be positive while the rest were negative. The eighteen samples were simultaneously determined for amphetamines by EMIT (Syva Company). Sixteen samples were found to be positive and 2 of negative samples had amphetamines levels of 0.48-0.85 micrograms/mL. When the same samples were subjected to qualitative screening and some were found false negative as follows: 7 cases in Color Test by using test solution kits amphetamine in urine (the Department of Medical Science, Ministry of Public Health), 8 cases by Albuscreen Ontrax for amphetamine (Roche Diagnostic System), 5 cases by amphetamine Double Antibody 125I-RIA (Diagnostic Products Corporation-DPC) and 3 cases by the method of Ten-One (DPC) respectively. But when forty four samples which gave negative results by TDx were subjected to Testing by EMIT and Ontrax. The results of both EMIT and Ontrax were negative. Some of forty four samples were false positive by the Color Test solution kit amphetamines in urine and amphetamine Double Antibody 125I-RIA. Reliability of results reported not only depends on the methodology or principle but also the sensitivity of the method.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine/urine , Automobile Driving , Central Nervous System Stimulants/urine , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Male , Mass Screening , Sensitivity and Specificity , Substance Abuse Detection , Substance-Related Disorders/urine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL